tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.comments2022-07-31T05:41:42.188-04:00丁丁飆英文Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger311125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-77704943406108131672013-03-13T03:27:32.549-04:002013-03-13T03:27:32.549-04:00寫得真好~ 感謝分享寫得真好~ 感謝分享Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-81084406879042569812012-07-12T10:57:15.940-04:002012-07-12T10:57:15.940-04:00政治上和宗教上,歐洲還是掛念「大一統」。當今歐盟,不也是在「經濟上」追求大一統嗎~~政治上和宗教上,歐洲還是掛念「大一統」。當今歐盟,不也是在「經濟上」追求大一統嗎~~丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-37573613721037094942012-07-10T22:04:46.435-04:002012-07-10T22:04:46.435-04:00這兩天在看這個
http://www.youtube.com/user/achu2003cn/vid...這兩天在看這個<br />http://www.youtube.com/user/achu2003cn/videos?query=%E5%93%88%E5%B8%83%E6%96%AF%E5%A0%A1<br />找資料看這這篇<br />幫我釐清許多啊~~感謝<br />文中提到皇位、諸侯、領地之千的特殊關係<br />我想這和古羅馬公民權力觀與初代基督教文化的教會權威論的結合有關<br />因為無論是皇帝、諸侯、封地領主 <br />其權威來源皆從屬上帝<br />彼此不能互相踐越Hattivatiithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15422643590991364230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-55845854472078809312011-09-15T13:11:08.720-04:002011-09-15T13:11:08.720-04:00感謝!
原來刪除符號不見了
趕快去改正~~感謝!<br />原來刪除符號不見了<br />趕快去改正~~丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-55847030262512744512011-09-15T12:46:19.424-04:002011-09-15T12:46:19.424-04:00"原文為什麼不是 in general terms that cases involvin..."原文為什麼不是 in general terms that cases involving green card status are complex?"<br />這段跟原文一樣喔~~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-74317006132831140302011-09-13T11:34:02.793-04:002011-09-13T11:34:02.793-04:00所以叫「大眾」媒體啊~~
:-)所以叫「大眾」媒體啊~~<br />:-)丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-9352309737799405592011-09-13T11:30:23.151-04:002011-09-13T11:30:23.151-04:00沒錯。
Cathay 源自Khitan 契丹,即先遼後金所統治的中國北方。沒錯。<br /><br />Cathay 源自Khitan 契丹,即先遼後金所統治的中國北方。丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-23391653149882463232011-09-13T11:14:02.084-04:002011-09-13T11:14:02.084-04:00作個補充,自馬可波羅後,老外都喜把中國稱作Cathay(「國泰」乎?「華夏」乎?)作個補充,自馬可波羅後,老外都喜把中國稱作Cathay(「國泰」乎?「華夏」乎?)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-83314761947911477492011-09-11T11:55:21.008-04:002011-09-11T11:55:21.008-04:00你這則應沒幾個人看懂,但造訪者既是小眾,所以看懂者比例又也許蠻高的。
你的意見我深有同感,近日亦對...你這則應沒幾個人看懂,但造訪者既是小眾,所以看懂者比例又也許蠻高的。<br /><br />你的意見我深有同感,近日亦對一二好友吐抒過類似見解。不過,一個剛崛起的「地域」要建立自信本來就需要時間(往往數以十年計),期間難免會有些荒腔走板表現。若希望這成熟過程早點來到,只能祈願目前的媒體結構早被打破,但這似乎有點難,因為全世界的媒體結構都愈來愈「吾從眾」。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-47908852291858974122011-09-03T10:37:13.658-04:002011-09-03T10:37:13.658-04:00非也, 我不是這個意思, 我是指上了車不一定懷孕, 而shotgun marriage重點不在沒買票...非也, 我不是這個意思, 我是指上了車不一定懷孕, 而shotgun marriage重點不在沒買票(結婚)就上車(性行為), 而在 pregnancy. 我說的「果」指結「籽」。丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-26785546803378269132011-09-03T10:31:12.779-04:002011-09-03T10:31:12.779-04:00「先上車」和「後補票」是一有機整體,只要是「先」上了車,「結果」就必然是要「補票」。格主說「結果」未...「先上車」和「後補票」是一有機整體,只要是「先」上了車,「結果」就必然是要「補票」。格主說「結果」未知如何,一定是受「先上車」前兩個字的一時蒙蔽。^^<br /><br />但不管如何,光用「先上車」三字來暗示要「補票」還是太迂迴了。小大大noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-35396812554611341272011-09-02T12:29:33.992-04:002011-09-02T12:29:33.992-04:00以下出自某篇網路轉貼文章:
台湾subway的每一节车厢,都有几个priority seat,也就...以下出自某篇網路轉貼文章:<br />台湾subway的每一节车厢,都有几个priority seat,也就是我们国内的老幼病残座,但台湾的subway和公车将此翻译成“博爱座”。我第一次在台湾时看到这个译名,心里就暗暗叫好。这译名比我们的那个名字好太多了:一,尊重弱势者的自尊心,不说别人是残疾人;第二,强调的是要大家献爱心;第三,这中文名字还挺合乎原来的英文发音!Lily Linoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-29580126822258942542011-09-02T10:18:54.374-04:002011-09-02T10:18:54.374-04:00是啊,不知譯者為何不用這個現成的詞。
可惜迂迴的「先上車」也不能用,因為上車不表示是否「結果」。是啊,不知譯者為何不用這個現成的詞。<br />可惜迂迴的「先上車」也不能用,因為上車不表示是否「結果」。丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-71899282397982680272011-09-02T09:38:11.639-04:002011-09-02T09:38:11.639-04:00若有字數限制,作「奉子成婚」便可,雖然味道淡了點。若有字數限制,作「奉子成婚」便可,雖然味道淡了點。小大大noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-15039337185716677552011-08-27T22:10:40.035-04:002011-08-27T22:10:40.035-04:00博愛座?是中文原生詞吧?非外來也。
幽默:應屬音譯加吉意聯想
劍橋:是拆字合譯,劍本身仍是音,橋為意...博愛座?是中文原生詞吧?非外來也。<br />幽默:應屬音譯加吉意聯想<br />劍橋:是拆字合譯,劍本身仍是音,橋為意譯,而不是同一字面既音且意~~<br /><br />同一訊息放在G+上,有人說 talk show 脫口秀。<br /><br />嗯這「脫口」二字譯 talk, 有音有意,差可擬矣。丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-25937104671240012812011-08-27T11:50:49.479-04:002011-08-27T11:50:49.479-04:00「劍橋」不知算不算音譯加意譯。「劍橋」不知算不算音譯加意譯。old friendnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-76031752920286898072011-08-27T07:04:19.151-04:002011-08-27T07:04:19.151-04:002. 音譯 + 意譯:
博愛座? 幽默?2. 音譯 + 意譯:<br />博愛座? 幽默?Lily Linoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-68127380109967681132011-08-14T08:13:21.113-04:002011-08-14T08:13:21.113-04:00如果我也住在台北,我也會趕進來報名....
只可惜我住在台中Q_Q(ㄧ我ABCD都想參加,哈哈,真是...如果我也住在台北,我也會趕進來報名....<br />只可惜我住在台中Q_Q(ㄧ我ABCD都想參加,哈哈,真是太貪心了)Recpd。律墨https://www.blogger.com/profile/01793382792348223965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-1672251459730100262011-08-05T07:13:25.983-04:002011-08-05T07:13:25.983-04:00如果我住台北就趕緊報名參加如果我住台北就趕緊報名參加Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07675006381710669711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-38853517790737909522011-06-26T08:10:18.974-04:002011-06-26T08:10:18.974-04:00謝謝你,譯文部分幫助我很大 by初學者謝謝你,譯文部分幫助我很大 by初學者追求快樂https://www.blogger.com/profile/05144275069351422438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-2652626068106812632011-05-10T23:37:44.790-04:002011-05-10T23:37:44.790-04:00根據手上這本老舊的文智版千家詩
確是北宋蘇老爺的大作
又聞千家詩確是南宋謝老爺首輯
但吾生也晚,無...根據手上這本老舊的文智版千家詩<br />確是北宋蘇老爺的大作<br />又聞千家詩確是南宋謝老爺首輯<br /><br />但吾生也晚,無法親向他二位請益<br />(是您寫的嗎,還是您,又是您編的嗎)<br />只能盡信民國書啦<br /><br />網上查得這則:<br /><a href="http://ipoem.cca.gov.tw/poem/mm00030666/showEntry.html?id=mm00034217" rel="nofollow">千家詩說本詩是蘇軾所作,但蘇軾詩集中沒有這有詩,全宋詩依據疊山集列為謝枋得作品</a>丁丁https://www.blogger.com/profile/10419893549814098207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-4435219358059215162011-05-10T13:44:49.033-04:002011-05-10T13:44:49.033-04:00花影作者蘇軾乎?謝枋得乎?花影作者蘇軾乎?謝枋得乎?問題https://www.blogger.com/profile/03229561786571297890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-92047516412528631242011-02-21T06:20:14.390-05:002011-02-21T06:20:14.390-05:00貼意見還要版主恩准, 喪氣呀!貼意見還要版主恩准, 喪氣呀!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07675006381710669711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-67795563862710699302011-02-21T06:19:19.207-05:002011-02-21T06:19:19.207-05:00簡直好得無法以言語形容...簡直好得無法以言語形容...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07675006381710669711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6940133089240245630.post-5766271869944698072011-02-21T06:18:26.401-05:002011-02-21T06:18:26.401-05:00真是微丁丁, 萬古如長夜!真是微丁丁, 萬古如長夜!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com